Dummit & Foote Chapter 10 - Modules
Section 10.1 - Basic Definitions and Examples
Definition. Let \(R\) be a ring. A left \(R\)-module or a left module over \(R\) is a nonempty set \(M\) together with
- A binary operation \(+\) on \(M\) under which \(M\) is an abelian group
- An action \(\times\) of \(R\) on \(M\), that is, a map or function \(R \times M \rightarrow M\), denoted \(rm\), that for all \(r, s \in R, m, n \in M\) satisfies
- \((r + s)m = rm + sm\)
- \((rs)m = r(sm)\)
- \(r(m + n) = rm + rn\)
- If \(R\) has identity \(1\), then \(1m = m\)
Theorem. If \(R\) is commutative, any left-module is also a right-module.
Remark. Modules over a field \(F\) and vector spaces over \(F\) are identical.
Definition. An R-submodule is a subset\(N \subseteq M\) which is closed under the action taken forall \(r \in R\). That is, given \(r \in R, n \in N\), then \(rn \in N\). Every module has at least two submodules: itself and the trivial (empty) submodule.
Remark. If \(F\) is a field, submodules are equivalent to subspaces.
Example. Let \(F\) be a field and \(F[x]\) a polynomial ring. Then, let \(V\) be a vector space of \(F\), and \(T\) be a linear transformation from \(V\) to itself. That is, \(V: T \rightarrow T\). We know that \(V\) is an \(F\)-module. We will want to show that \(V\) can be written as an \(F[x]\)-module for some choice of \(T\). That is, we want an action \(F[x] \times V \rightarrow V\).
Now, for a given linear transformation \(T\), consider some polynomial \(p(x) = a_n x^n + \ldots + a_0\) and some \(v \in V\). We define \(p(x) \times v\) by$
with \(T^n\) being defined as applying \(T\) a total of \(n\) times.
Proposition. Let \(R\) be a ring and \(M\) an \(R\)-module. Then, a subset \(N\) of \(M\) is a submodule of \(M\) if and only if
- \(N \neq \emptyset\)
- For all \(r \in R\), \(x, y \in N\), then \(rx - y \in N\)
Definition. Let \(R\) be a commutative ring with identity. An \(R\)-algebra is a ring \(A\) together with a ring homomorphism \(f: R \rightarrow A\) such that \(\varphi(1_R) = 1_A\). Thus, the subring \(f(R) \subseteq A\) is contained in the center of \(A\).
Recall. The center of a ring \(A\) is the subring \(A'\) such that for all \(x, y \in R'\), then \(xy = yx\). In other words, it is the commutative subring of \(A\).
Definition. Given two \(R\)-algebras \(A, B\), an *\(R\)-algebra homomorphism$ is a ring homomorphism \(\varphi: A \rightarrow B\) that maps \(1_A \rightarrow 1_B\) such that \(\varphi(ra) = r\varphi(a)\).
Section 10.2 - Quotient Modules and Module Homomorphisms
Definition. Let \(R\) be a ring and \(M, N\) be \(R\)-modules. then a ring homomorphism \(\varphi: M \rightarrow N\) is an \(R\)-module homomorphism if for all \(r \in R\), \(\varphi(rx) = r\varphi(x)\).
Theorem. An \(R\)-module homomorphism is an isomorphism if it is 1-1 and onto, and said modules are isomorphic.
Definition. Let \(M, N\) be \(R\)-modules. The set \(\text{Hom}_R(M, N)\) is the set of all homomorphisms from \(M\) to \(N\).
Proposition. Let \(M\), \(N\), and \(L\) be \(R\)-modules. Then,
- A function \(\varphi: M \rightarrow N\) is an \(R\)-module homomorphism if and only if \(\varphi(rx + y) = r\varphi(x) + \varphi(y)\) for all \(x, y \in M\) and \(r \in R\).
- Let \(\varphi, \psi \in \text{Hom}_R(M, N)\). Then, define \(\varphi + \psi\) as
Then, \(\varphi + \psi \in \text{Hom}_R(M, N)\). Additionally, if \(R\) is commutative, with \((r\varphi)(m) = r(\varphi(m))\), then \(r\varphi \in \text{Hom}_R(M,N)\) 3. If \(\varphi \in \text{Hom}_R(L, M)\) and \(\psi \in \text{Hom}_R(M, N)\), then \(\psi \circ \varphi \in \text{Hom}_R(L, N)\) 4. \(\text{Hom}_R(M, M)\) is a ring with identity. With \(R\) being commutative, \(\text{Hom}_R(M, M)\) is an \(R\)-algebra.
Proposition. Let \(R\) be a ring, \(M\) an \(R\)-module, and \(N \subseteq M\) an \(R\)-submodule. then, \(M/N\) can be made into an \(R\)-module by defining addition. With \(r \in R\) and \(x + N \in M/N\),
That is,
Definition. Let \(A, B\) be submodules of the \(R\)-module \(M\). Then, the sum of \(A\) and \(B\) is defined as
This is the smallest submodule that contains both \(A\) and \(B\).
Theorem. First Isomorphism Theorem. Let \(M, N\) be \(R\)-modules, and \(\varphi: M \rightarrow N\) be an \(R\)-module homomorphism. Then, \(\ker \varphi\) is a submodule of \(M\), and \(M / \ker \varphi \cong \varphi(M)\).
Theorem. Second Isomorphism Theorem. Let \(A, B\) be submodules of the \(R\)-module \(M\). Then, \((A + B)/B \cong A/(A \cap B)\).
Theorem. Third Isomorphism Theorem. Let \(M\) be an \(R\)-module, and \(A \subseteq B\) be submodules of \(M\). Then, \(\frac{M/A}{B/A} \cong M/B\).
Theorem. Lattice Isomorphism Theorem. Let \(N\) be a submodule of the \(R\)-module \(M\). Then, there is a bijection between submodules of \(M\) containing \(N\) and submodules of \(M/N\). This is given by \(A \leftrightarrow A/N\), for \(A \supseteq N\).
Section 10.3 - Generation of Modules, Direct Sums, and Free Modules
Definition. Let \(M\) be an \(R\)-module and \(N_1, \ldots, N_n\) be submodules of \(M\).
- The sum of \(N_1, \ldots, N_n\) is the set of all finite sums of elements from the sets \(N_i\). That is, \(N_1, \ldots, N_n := \{a_1 + a_2 + \ldots + a_n | a_i \in N_i\}\)
- For any subset \(A\) of \(M\), let \(RA = \{r_1 a_1 + r_2 a_2 + \ldots + r_m a_m | r_i \in R, a_i \in A\}\). If \(N\) is a submodule of \(M\) such that \(N = RA\), then \(A\) is called the generating set for \(N\).
- A submodule \(N\) of \(M\) is finitely generated if there is some finite subset \(A\) of \(M\) such that \(N = RA\). That is, \(N\) is generated by some finite subset.
- A submodule of \(M\) (up to equality) is \(cyclic\) if there exists some element \(a \in M\) such that \(N = Ra = \{ra | r \in R\}\).
Definition. Let \(M_1, \ldots, M_k\) be a collection of \(R\)-modules. Then, the direct product is defined as
This direct product is in itself an \(R\)-module.
Proposition. Let \(N_1, \ldots, N_n\) be submodules of the \(R\)-module \(M\). Then, the following are equivalent:
- The map \(\pi: N_1 \otimes \ldots \otimes N_k \rightarrow N_1 + \ldots + N_k\) defined by \(\pi(a_1, \ldots, a_n) = a_1 + \ldots + a_n\) is an isomorphism
- \(N_j \cup (N+1 + \ldots + N_{j-1} + N{j+1} + \ldots + N_n) = 0\) for all \(j \in \{1, 2, \ldots, k\}\)
- Every \(x \in N_1 + \ldots + N_n\) can be written uniquely in the form \(a_1 + \ldots + a_n\), with \(a_i \in N_i\)
Definition. An \(R\)-module \(F\) is said to be free on the subset \(A\) of \(F\) if for every nonzero \(x \in F\), there exists nonzero elements \(r_1, \ldots, r_n\) of \(R\) and unique \(a_1, \ldots, a_n\) such that \(x = r_1 a_1 + \ldots + r_n a_n\) for some \(n \in \mathbb{Z}^+\). That is, \(A\) is a basis or set of free generators of \(F\).
Theorem. For any set \(A\), there is a free \(R\)-module \(F(A)\) on \(A\) such that \(F(A)\) satisfies the universal property: if \(M\) is any \(R\)-module, and \(\varphi: A \rightarrow M\) is a map of sets, there exists a unique \(R\)-module homomorphism: \(\Phi: F(A) \rightarrow M\) such that \(\Phi(a) = \varphi(a)\) for all \(a \in A\).
Corollary. If \(F_1\) and \(F_2\) are free modules on \(A\), then there is a unique isomorphism between \(F_1\) and \(F_2\), which is the identity map on A.
Corollary. If \(F\) is a free \(R\)-module with basis \(A\), then \(F \cong F(A)\).
Definition. For a free module \(F\) with basis \(A\), if \(R\) is commutative, then the rank of \(F\) is the cardinality of \(A\).
Section 10.4 - Tensor Products of Modules
Skipped
Section 10.5 - Exact Sequences - Projective, Injective, and Flat Modules
Skipped